I want you to read a piece and tell me your thoughts:
A young Man asked a father for his daughter’s hand,
And received it in a box – her Left hand.
THE BOX FATHERED THE HAND OF THE DAUGHTER RECIEVING THE MAN WHO ASKED
That’s an interesting response. Actually I was trying to define what makes “poetry”: form or content? My “piece” was basically the first sentence in a short story by Patricia Highsmith which reads: “A young man asked a father for his daughter’s hand, and received it in a box – her left hand.”
What are your thoughts on all this “poetry” running amok in Prague’s Xpat scene?
AS A WRITER WRITES SO SURELY A POET POETS AND HOW TO TELL A POET BUT BY HIS FORM, OR PRAPS (ALMOST A DECLENSION OF PRAHA, BUT NOT QUITE) HIS GEOGRAPHY
So, if I understand your last point on geography correctly, a “management consultant” in, say, San Francisco, could suddenly become a “poet” in Prague without necessarily having any innate talent?
AS AN ARTIST ARTS SO I FART, THE CLOUD MAY FORM ACCORDING TO THE PREVAILING WIND
It certainly is a cloudy and windy issue – all this “art” talk. Surely as the poet poets and the writer writes and the artist arts, it could be suggested that the quality of the verb determines the identity of the subject? This gets into a deeper question: which comes first; the Noun or the Verb?
TO BE OR A BEING WHETHER THE SEEING REQUIRES THE BEING OR TO HAVE SEEN IS TO HAVE BEEN
Your enigmatic statements refuse to give a conclusive answer… How god-like of you. Your Zen style answers are merely a restatement of my original question, which I’ll rephrase for you in Western terms: “In the Beginning was the Word” – but was it a Noun or a Verb?
WHAT IS A WORD WITHOUT BEING HEARD IS THE SPEAKER A PART OF THE JOKE, OR JUST HE THAT SPOKE
I detect a certain synthetic, dialectical answer in your words, which I like very much. It suggests that God needs an audience to join in the applause when the curtain falls… Would that be an accurate assesment of your views?
IS AN ARTIST APART FROM HIS ART ARE THE CLAPS BUT THE START IS A FART BUT A PART
… of the beginning of the shit that fertilizes the earth to grow crops of hops that brews the stews of happy beers for our satisfied hearts?
OR THE ART THAT STARTS AND PARTS AND DEPARTS TO RESTART
Thank you for your illuminating thoughts. To sum up this conversation,
I suppose we can conclusively agree that shit is a necessary part in the process of artistic creation?
ART IS SHIT BUT IS SHIT ART?
TO NAME IS THE GAME,
THE WINNER LOSES.
Daniel Kenney & Noel LeBon (neither will take the blame)